A memory layer answers "what does the agent know going in?" Kontour answers "what did the answer stand on coming out?" The first is a context concern; the second is a trust concern. Standardizing the first — as knowledge formats now do — makes the second question more acute, not less: once everyone can assemble context, "but is the answer grounded?" is the question left standing.
A knowledge-format layer
e.g. OKF (Open Knowledge Format)
Standardizes the knowledge an agent consumes — context going in. It is deliberately silent on trust: no integrity, provenance, or freshness semantics. That's the seam, not a conflict: a knowledge bundle is a clean source for grounding, and a trust layer is built to supply what any such format leaves out.
A memory platform
e.g. Context Lattice
Owns what the agent remembers across sessions — retrieval, salience, forgetting. Kontour never sees or stores that memory. It records what the work stood on when the agent acted, whatever memory system fed it.
Hook-based external memory
harness hooks writing to your own store
Rolls memory by hand with runtime hooks. Kontour's hooks ride the same harness surfaces without claiming them — sidecar state is workflow evidence under .kontourai/, not a memory retrieval index. What the hooks inject is workflow steering, never remembered knowledge.
Honest scope: these are examples of the architectural pattern, not tested integrations or partnership claims. We describe how the layers compose; we don't certify vendors.