Kontour Veritas Governance Kit — readiness adapter
A readiness evaluation that a required standard blocks: the projected software-readiness-verdict claim derives to disputed, showing what a gate looks like when it refuses to pass.
These are the statuses the validator works out from the evidence, not the ones written in the file. Run the command further down and you get this row back.
In plain language
The answer was no.
Check it yourself
Download the raw .bundle above and run it through @kontourai/surface — our implementation of the Hachure trust.bundle format, an open spec we publish schemas for but don't own the definition of. The command prints the same status row this page shows, and exits non-zero if the artifact isn't a well-formed trust.bundle.
Want a second opinion from a different codebase? The hachure reference CLI reads the same file against the spec's own schemas and reaches the same verdict. Both are still maintained by us — the implementations are independent, the organization behind them isn't yet.
Prefer the library directly? The CLI just calls it:
Open questions
Straight from the validator's own transparencyGaps and high-impact-unsupported lists — the same lines the command above prints. Not a count this site works out for itself.
Evidence explicitly reported a non-passing result. — the written policy for this claim was not satisfied.
On the claim: “mergeReadiness”
Provenance
Produced by running the kit's readiness-to-trust-bundle.mjs adapter (commit 1948639) over the committed not-ready readiness record above; the projection is deterministic and re-runnable.
Recomputing tells you the file is internally consistent and hasn't been edited since. It doesn't tell you nobody rewrote the evidence before publishing — that's what the pinned commit is for. Follow it and compare.
Evidence
Veritas readiness verdict is not ready (run veritas-1783001840335). Blocking: required-veritas-cli-artifacts.
veritas:readiness:veritas-1783001840335
The artifact
The unedited claim list as it sits in the file. The wording is the pipeline's own note-taking — written for the next run, not for reading — and it's here so you can check that the summary above didn't quietly skip anything.
| Derived status | Subject / field | Type · facet | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| disputed | working-tree:798d536c54a9d1c0d4c238509527732827088f61d7e74a65c9f830ccb8d77ecamergeReadiness | software-readiness-verdictveritas.readiness | {"verdict":"not-ready","sourceRef":"working-tree:798d536c54a9d1c0d4c238509527732827088f61d7e74a65c9f830ccb8d77eca","blocking":{"failedRequirements":["required-veritas-cli-artifacts"],"failedEvidenceChecks":[]}} |